Notes from October 26, 2009

—Nicholas Rescher's list of possible reasons as to why philosophy doesn't (seem) to make any progress:

(1) methodological differences lead to different results
(2) psychological differences among thinkers
(3) structural problems
      (a) originality is awarded
      (b) obscurity is awarded
(4) cultural differences among thinkers
(5) philosophy is a pseudo-discipline. Its questions aren't sensible or legitimate

Notes from March 24, 2010

"White on White," Kasimir Malevich, 1918

—Notes on "On the Possibility of Philosophical Knowledge," George Bealer

What are Intuitions?

(a) An intuition is an intellectual "seeming," not a sensory or introspective "seeming."

(b) Philosophical intuitions are a priori intuitions, not physical intuitions.

(c) They are not beliefs. I can have an intuition that something is right (a mathematical proof, for example) and simultaneously believe it is wrong. Also, belief is highly plastic; intuitions aren't.

(d) Not all intuitions are linguistic intuitions, i.e. intuitions about words and their applications.

(e) Not all intuitions are analytic, i.e. arriving from the combination of logic and the definition of terms.

(f) Intuitions can be mistaken. Locally, a single intuition can be wrong. Holistically, a person's systematization can be wrong.